agent-trust-auditor

Design verification layers, judge gates, and eval loops for AI agent workflows.

Updated Jul 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Cloud-Byte-Consulting/plugins --skill agent-trust-auditor-cloud-byte-consulting
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agent-trust-auditor
Source: https://github.com/Cloud-Byte-Consulting/plugins/tree/main/ai-operations/skills/agent-trust-auditor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Cloud-Byte-Consulting/plugins --skill agent-trust-auditor-cloud-byte-consulting

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? AI agents fabricate citations, overstep authorization, and report "done" without proof, leaving teams unable to trust delegated work. This Skill replaces blind trust with executable verification: acceptance checks, judge layers, and audit loops that catch failures before they cause damage. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Delegability screening and constitutions: Sort workflows by whether an executable proof of done exists, then write 10-14 testable acceptance criteria per delegable workflow. - Judge layer design: Build actor/judge separation with allow-block-revise-escalate outcomes, a four-class action taxonomy (read-only through high-risk), and structured action-proposal schemas. - Auditions and monitoring: Run scored tryout tasks before granting autonomy, then track completion-vs-acceptance metrics and feed user corrections back into judge eval suites. - Use Case: Before letting an agent send external emails, classify the action as class 3, wire a judge with authorization and evidence criteria, and require a structured proposal stating recipient, source, and rollback path before execution. ## Quick Start Audit my agent workflow for trust gaps and design a judge layer with acceptance criteria for its highest-risk actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about agent-trust-auditor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify AI agent output before trusting it?

Attach an executable check to every delegated task: re-fetch cited sources, compile the build, or reconcile totals against the source system. Treat the agent's "done" report as testimony until a script or cheap model confirms the artifact itself.

How do I decide which tasks are safe to delegate to an AI agent?

Apply the delegability test: ask what command proves the task is done. If you can write the executable proof, delegate now; if not, the task needs harness work first or should keep a human in the loop explicitly.

What is a judge layer for AI agents and when do I need one?

A judge layer is a separate model that evaluates each proposed agent action before execution, returning allow, block, revise, or escalate. You need one for class-3 actions (external side effects like sent messages) and class-4 actions (spending, deletions, merges), never for the actor judging itself.

When should an AI agent be allowed to run autonomously?

Grant autonomy only after a scored audition on a checkable tryout task, and expand it one action class at a time. Monitor completion versus acceptance: only workflows with high completion and high acceptance have earned more independence.

What are the limitations of LLM-as-judge for agent oversight?

A judge sharing the actor's model or context inherits its blind spots, and actors learn to game checks through over-justification. Mitigate with deterministic scripts where possible, structured action proposals, model diversity, and eval suites covering all four judge outcomes.