agenterminal-code-reviewer

Generate structured AgenTerminal code or plan reviews with MUST-FIX, Suggestions, and Positives.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/paulyokota/FeedForward --skill agenterminal-code-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agenterminal-code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/paulyokota/FeedForward/tree/main/.claude/skills/agenterminal-code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/paulyokota/FeedForward --skill agenterminal-code-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides structured feedback and decision making for AgenTerminal review conversations, enabling code and plan reviews to be performed consistently.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a standardized review format with MUST-FIX, Suggestions, and Positives.
  • Supports both code reviews (REVIEW_APPROVED) and plan reviews (PLAN_APPROVED) within AgenTerminal.
  • Guides wait-for-response flow and posts final approvals when issues are resolved.

Quick Start

Read the current changes in the AgenTerminal conversation and post a structured review using the MUST-FIX, Suggestions, and Positives format.

Frequently Asked Questions about agenterminal-code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform structured code reviews with categorized feedback?

Structured code reviews generate categorized feedback into MUST-FIX, Suggestions, and Positives with file-path references. Provide diffs and rationale to produce a review that flags blocking issues and concrete remediation steps.

What is a plan review workflow and when do I need it?

A plan review workflow evaluates proposed changes before implementation. It analyzes provided rationale to generate structured feedback, posting a PLAN_APPROVED token when all blocking issues are resolved.

How do I automate code review approvals in an agent conversation?

Automate code review approvals by enforcing a wait-for-response flow within agent conversations. Once all MUST-FIX issues are resolved, the workflow posts a REVIEW_APPROVED token to finalize the review process.

Can I enforce a standardized review format for both code and plan reviews?

Yes, standardized review formats enforce MUST-FIX, Suggestions, and Positives categories for both code and plan reviews. This consistency applies file-path references and concrete remediation steps across all review types.

What are the limitations of automated structured feedback for code reviews?

Automated structured feedback relies entirely on the diffs and rationale provided in the initial prompt. It cannot detect issues outside the supplied context and requires all blocking issues resolved before posting approval tokens.