agentic-eval

Automate iterative evaluation and refinement of AI agent outputs with JSON feedback.

37.6k|4.7k|Updated Jun 11, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill agentic-eval
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agentic-eval
Source: https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/skills/agentic-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill agentic-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables automated self-evaluation and iterative refinement of AI-generated outputs, reducing errors and enhancing quality through structured critique loops.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Basic Reflection: Agents critique their own output and refine it based on feedback.
  • Evaluator-Optimizer: Separate generation and evaluation to improve reliability.
  • Code-Specific Reflection: Test-driven refinement for code and technical artifacts.
  • Use Case: Improve code, reports, and analyses by applying consistent evaluation criteria and iterative improvements.

Quick Start

Initiate a 3-iteration evaluation cycle on your task: Generate → Evaluate → Critique → Refine → Output

Frequently Asked Questions about agentic-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How can I improve AI-generated code quality through iterative refinement?

Iterative refinement uses self-critique loops where an AI agent evaluates its own code output against quality criteria, identifies issues, and regenerates improved versions. This process repeats over multiple iterations to progressively enhance correctness and reliability before final delivery.

What is self-critique and how does it reduce errors in AI outputs?

Self-critique is a structured feedback mechanism where an AI evaluates its own work against predefined rubrics, surfaces defects or gaps, and refines the output accordingly. Multiple critique cycles converge toward higher-quality results by catching and correcting errors that single-pass generation misses.

Can I automate quality evaluation for code, documentation, and data analysis?

Yes. Automated evaluation applies consistent rubrics to AI-generated artifacts across coding, documentation, and analysis tasks. Structured JSON feedback and configurable iteration limits enable systematic quality checks and refinement loops tailored to your domain requirements.

How do I set up an evaluation-optimizer workflow to improve AI reliability?

An evaluator-optimizer workflow separates generation from evaluation: an AI produces initial output, a second evaluator assesses it against criteria, then a refinement loop regenerates improved versions. This separation isolates evaluation logic and enables independent tuning of both stages for higher overall reliability.

What happens when AI outputs converge during iterative evaluation?

Convergence checks detect when successive refinement iterations produce no measurable improvement, signaling that maximum quality has been reached. This prevents wasted iterations and provides a stopping point before hitting your configured iteration limit.