agentic-eval

Implement self-critique loops and evaluator-optimizer pipelines for AI agent outputs.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MoonAxis/azure-stack --skill agentic-eval-moonaxis
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agentic-eval
Source: https://github.com/MoonAxis/azure-stack/tree/main/skills/agentic-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MoonAxis/azure-stack --skill agentic-eval-moonaxis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of ensuring AI-generated content meets specific quality standards by enabling iterative refinement through self-evaluation and correction.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Self-Critique Loops: Agents can evaluate their own outputs against defined criteria and identify areas for improvement.
  • Iterative Refinement: Supports workflows where outputs are progressively improved based on feedback.
  • Use Case: When generating complex code, an agent can write the code, then evaluate it against test cases and style guides, and automatically fix any identified issues before presenting the final version.

Quick Start

Use the agentic-eval skill to implement a basic reflection loop for improving AI-generated text based on provided criteria.

Frequently Asked Questions about agentic-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I implement self-critique loops to improve AI agent outputs?

Self-critique loops allow agents to evaluate their own outputs against defined criteria and identify areas for iterative improvement. This pattern progressively refines responses by applying feedback cycles before presenting the final result.

What is the LLM-as-judge approach for AI evaluation?

The LLM-as-judge approach uses a language model to evaluate AI-generated content against rubric-based criteria. It enables automated quality assurance by scoring outputs and feeding results back into evaluator-optimizer pipelines for refinement.

How do I build test-driven code refinement workflows for AI agents?

Test-driven code refinement workflows involve an agent writing code, evaluating it against test cases and style guides, and automatically fixing identified issues. This iterative refinement ensures complex code meets quality standards before delivery.

Can I use rubric-based evaluation to measure agent response quality?

Yes, rubric-based evaluation measures agent response quality by checking outputs against predefined scoring criteria. This technique supports self-critique loops and helps identify specific areas for agent refinement.

Do I need external dependencies to create evaluator-optimizer pipelines?

No external dependencies are required to create evaluator-optimizer pipelines. The system provides self-contained patterns and techniques for implementing iterative improvement and self-evaluation directly within your agent workflows.

When should I use iterative refinement for AI-generated content?

Iterative refinement is best used when AI-generated content must meet specific quality standards, such as complex code generation. It allows agents to progressively improve outputs based on self-evaluation feedback before final presentation.