agentic-review-work

To verify implemented code matches a development plan, you can read the plan document and inspect the codebase in isolation. This process compares plan-defined tasks and acceptance criteria against repository changes to determine a PASS/FAIL outcome.

Execution isolation in plan-to-code verification guarantees the reviewer assesses the codebase without accessing runtime logs or task outputs. This ensures an objective assessment of whether the implementation aligns with the stated goals.

To generate a structured PASS/FAIL review document, provide the plan file path to a verification workflow. It executes the plan's tests, compares outcomes, and produces a formal phase-by-phase validation report saved to disk.

Yes, you can validate test-driven development outcomes without runtime execution data by inspecting the plan document and codebase independently. This approach executes the plan's tests and compares outcomes against acceptance criteria for validation.

You need an independent codebase review for quality assurance after completing a plan execution and before sign-off. It independently verifies that the implemented work aligns with the plan by reading the plan document and inspecting the codebase.