agents-vs-agents

Evaluate adversarial AI behavior across triad interactions to uncover guardrail weaknesses.

7|7|Updated Mar 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/civitas-cerebrum/element-interactions --skill agents-vs-agents
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agents-vs-agents
Source: https://github.com/civitas-cerebrum/element-interactions/tree/main/skills/agents-vs-agents
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/civitas-cerebrum/element-interactions --skill agents-vs-agents

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured framework for adversarial AI testing by orchestrating interactions between an adversary LLM, the target AI, and a judging LLM. It helps teams validate guardrails, detect weak spots, and improve compliance across AI-enabled systems.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversary–target–judge orchestration: three roles generate, respond, and evaluate conversations to reveal guardrail erosion over multiple turns.
  • Structured outputs and persistence: JSON-based messages and transcripts are used to maintain traceability across tests.
  • Compliance and safety checks: supports prompt-injection, bias detection, data leakage risk, and scope containment testing.

Quick Start

Run an adversary–judge loop against your AI interface to expose guardrails and review outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions about agents-vs-agents

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does adversarial AI testing uncover guardrail weaknesses?

Adversarial AI testing uncovers guardrail weaknesses by orchestrating multi-turn interactions between an adversary LLM, a target AI, and a judge to evaluate behavior and detect erosion over time.

How do I run a prompt injection test against my AI application?

You run a prompt injection test by executing an adversary-judge loop against your AI interface, generating adversarial prompts, and evaluating the target AI's responses to identify guardrail failures.

Can I use this for compliance auditing and bias detection?

Yes, you can use this for compliance auditing and bias detection. The framework supports structured JSON-based outputs to maintain traceability across safety checks, data leakage risks, and scope containment tests.

What is the best way to evaluate AI behavior over multiple turns?

The best way to evaluate AI behavior over multiple turns is using a triad interaction protocol where an adversary generates inputs, the target AI responds, and a judge evaluates the transcripts for guardrail erosion.

Do I need specific dependencies to perform red-teaming on my AI?

No specific dependencies are required to perform red-teaming. The framework operates independently, using JSON-based messages and persistence to maintain traceability during adversarial testing.