agentsop-bounded-loop

Enforce explicit counters and exit predicates to terminate LM-driven agent loops.

287|16|Updated May 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/agentsope/SkillAlchemy --skill agentsop-bounded-loop
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agentsop-bounded-loop
Source: https://github.com/agentsope/SkillAlchemy/tree/main/skills/agentsop-bounded-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/agentsope/SkillAlchemy --skill agentsop-bounded-loop

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It stops language-model-driven agent workflows from running forever when the loop logic lacks an explicit termination mechanism, causing runaway cost, rate-limits, and unusable failures.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Explicit termination contract: enforces a counter budget plus a checkable exit predicate that is outside the LM’s control.
  • Progress witness + stagnation detection: requires each loop iteration to change state in a measurable way, and fast-fails when the same error or output repeats.
  • Graceful escalation path: routes to an outer/human fallback with preserved state instead of crashing or endlessly retrying.

Use cases: bounding cyclic agent pipelines like tool-call→reflect→retry, plan→act→observe, optimizer/evaluator sweeps, code self-fix cycles, and multi-agent handoffs/supervisor patterns where delegation can create ping-pong loops.

Quick Start

Activate this skill when your agent hits a framework loop-depth/max-iteration error or shows repeated retries without improvement, and then refactor your workflow to add an iteration counter, progress witness, stagnation exit, and an escalation branch that preserves state.

Frequently Asked Questions about agentsop-bounded-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stop infinite agent loops in language model workflows?

To stop infinite agent loops, you need an explicit termination contract using a counter budget, checkable exit predicates, and stagnation detection outside the language model's control. This prevents runaway costs, rate-limits, and unusable failures by fast-failing repeated errors and routing to an escalation path with preserved state.

Why does my multi-agent delegation workflow keep ping-ponging without finishing?

Multi-agent delegation ping-pong happens when handoff loops lack explicit termination mechanisms. Implementing a framework-agnostic termination contract with shared persistent state updates and pure-Python predicates detects stagnation, enforces iteration budgets, and breaks unbounded retry cycles.

What is the best way to bound cyclic agent pipelines like plan-act-observe?

The best way to bound cyclic agent pipelines is enforcing a progress witness requiring each iteration to change state measurably, combined with an iteration counter and an escalation branch. This framework-agnostic approach fast-fails when outputs repeat instead of endlessly retrying.

Should I raise recursion_limit or max_turns to fix agent retry errors?

Raising recursion_limit, max_iter, or max_turns to fix agent retry errors is an anti-pattern that increases costs and delays failure. Instead, refactor your workflow to add an iteration counter, progress witness, stagnation exit, and an escalation branch that preserves state.

Can I use pure-Python predicates to terminate self-healing code loops?

Yes, pure-Python predicates can terminate self-healing code loops by evaluating shared persistent state updates outside the language model's control. This framework-agnostic termination contract ensures loops exit gracefully via a human or outer fallback when stagnation is detected.