agreement-review

Periodic agreement review cycles are managed by evaluating current relevance, checking for staleness or conflict, and producing a review outcome to either renew, revise, or sunset the agreement. This prevents governance decay by re-validating terms against current conditions.

Agreement renewal or sunset processes should be initiated when scheduled review dates arrive, participant requests are made, or threshold events occur. The review evaluates relevance and consistency to determine if terms should be renewed, revised, or sunset.

Checking agreements for staleness or conflict requires agreement data, participant feedback, conflict logs, and registry data. These inputs determine whether an agreement remains aligned with current community policies and conditions.

Yes, the same review process applies to all agreement types, including space, access, organizational, stewardship, culture codes, and the UAF. It evaluates relevance and appropriateness to guide decisions across all agreement categories.

Preventing governance decay requires regularly re-validating agreements against current conditions through scheduled or triggered reviews. This ensures terms remain relevant, appropriate, and consistent, leading to timely renewal, revision, or sunset actions.

To start a review for a specific agreement, initiate the process using the agreement ID. The system then convenes relevant participants to evaluate the terms and produce a renewal, revision, or sunset outcome.