ai-agent

Define AI agent operational requirements and decision boundaries for deployment.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nowonbun/nowonbun-harness --skill ai-agent-nowonbun
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai-agent
Source: https://github.com/nowonbun/nowonbun-harness/tree/main/codex-skills/action-management_ai-agent
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nowonbun/nowonbun-harness --skill ai-agent-nowonbun

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps engineers and architects convert vague requirements into a rigorous agent specification by forcing problem-first definitions, explicit decision boundaries, and verifiable integration contracts so agents behave predictably and safely in production.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Problem-first Design: Require clear operational problem statements, target users, success criteria, constraints, and non-goals before proposing architectures.
  • Pipeline and Contract Specification: Document ordered pipeline stages (input, intent, retrieval, planning, tool execution, validation, response, logging) with entry/exit contracts, error handling, and LLM/tool call schemas.
  • State, Observability & Verification: Define session/state boundaries, persistence rules, traceable identifiers, metrics/logging for model and tool calls, and verification scenarios covering success, failure, approval, and rollback.
  • Use Case: Use when designing a production customer-support automation agent that calls external services, requires approval gates for risky actions, and must provide auditable traces for compliance.

Quick Start

Document the operational problem, decision boundaries, pipeline stages, LLM and tool contracts, state rules, and verification scenarios before selecting models or implementing code.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design safe AI agents that combine LLM inference with external tools?

Design safe AI agents by defining clear operational requirements and decision boundaries before deployment. Specify pipeline stages, LLM and tool contracts, state management, and verification scenarios to ensure predictable behavior when combining LLM inference with external tools.

What's the best way to define pipeline stages and contracts for a production AI agent?

Define pipeline stages by documenting ordered steps from input and intent through retrieval, planning, tool execution, validation, response, and logging. Specify entry and exit contracts, error handling, and LLM call schemas for each stage to ensure verifiable agent behavior.

How do I set up observability and verification scenarios for an LLM agent?

Set up observability by defining session boundaries, persistence rules, traceable identifiers, and metrics for model and tool calls. Create verification scenarios covering success, failure, approval gates, and rollback rules to audit agent behavior.

When do I need approval gates and rollback rules in an AI agent pipeline?

Implement approval gates and rollback rules when an AI agent performs risky actions like calling external services. Verification scenarios must cover these boundaries to provide auditable traces for compliance and safe production deployment.

Can I use this approach to review an existing AI agent that calls MCP servers?

Yes, you can review existing agents by evaluating their operational requirements, decision boundaries, and tool contracts. The specification process applies to designing or reviewing agents that orchestrate LLM inference, MCP servers, and external tools across runtime pipelines.

Why should I define operational problems before selecting models for an AI agent?

Defining operational problems first forces problem-first design by requiring clear target users, success criteria, constraints, and non-goals. This rigorous agent specification prevents unpredictable behavior by ensuring architecture follows verifiable requirements.