ai-evaluation

Automate AI evaluation workflows for benchmarking, regression testing, and safety assessment.

3|Updated Sep 27, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Sheldon-92/TAD --skill ai-evaluation-sheldon-92
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/Sheldon-92/TAD/tree/main/.agents/skills/ai-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Sheldon-92/TAD --skill ai-evaluation-sheldon-92

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

AI evaluation workflows are often inconsistent, scattered across tools, and hard to scale as models evolve. This Skill bundles judgment rules, benchmarking practice, red-teaming guidance, and CI/CD patterns to enable repeatable, scalable evaluation for AI agents.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Cross-framework rules: Encodes evaluation norms for benchmarking, regression testing, A/B testing, and adversarial testing from established references.
  • CI/CD integration: Provides a layered evaluation architecture with deterministic checks, LLM-based judging, and human escalation for difficult cases.
  • Reusable templates: Supplies rubrics, calibration patterns, and references to speed adoption across teams.

Quick Start

Provide an agent description and run the unified evaluation suite to generate benchmarking and calibration results.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate LLM evaluation workflows for CI/CD pipelines?

Automate LLM evaluation workflows for CI/CD by applying layered architectures with deterministic checks, LLM-based judging, and human escalation to ensure reproducible benchmarking and safety assessment.

What is the best way to set up regression testing for AI agents?

Set up regression testing for AI agents by applying cross-reference rules and rubric-based scoring templates, which enable repeatable calibration and benchmarking as models evolve.

How does rubric-based scoring work for benchmarking AI models?

Rubric-based scoring for benchmarking AI models works by applying standardized cross-reference rules and calibration patterns to evaluate agent performance consistently across established references.

Can I run adversarial red-team testing using standardized evaluation harnesses?

You can run adversarial red-team testing using standardized evaluation harnesses that encode cross-framework rules for safety assessment and benchmarking across AI agents.

Do I need specific dependencies to reproduce A/B testing results for LLMs?

No specific dependencies are required to reproduce A/B testing results for LLMs; the evaluation harness supplies reusable templates and references to standardize calibration tasks.