ai-expertise-interrogation-designer

Generate a Funhouse Mirror AI literacy activity with interrogation protocols and distortion taxonomies.

583|96|Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills --skill ai-expertise-interrogation-designer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai-expertise-interrogation-designer
Source: https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills/tree/main/skills/ai-literacy/ai-expertise-interrogation-designer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills --skill ai-expertise-interrogation-designer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teachers run an AI literacy activity where students use their genuine domain expertise to identify AI distortions, omissions, and overconfidence—producing more durable skepticism than generic warnings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Expertise activation before AI: students document what they know first, creating a direct reference point to compare against AI output.
  • Calibrated interrogation questions: surface checks (factual accuracy) and deep checks (nuance, complexity, cultural specificity).
  • Distortion annotation + taxonomy: a structured way to classify what went wrong (distortion types rather than one-off errors) and synthesize patterns across the class.
  • Use case: assign students who have real expertise (e.g., sport, music traditions, local geography, subject knowledge) to interrogate an AI tool about their domain and generate evidence of systematic AI limitations.

Quick Start

Use the ai-expertise-interrogation-designer skill to generate a full Funhouse Mirror activity by providing student_expertise_domain and student_level.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai-expertise-interrogation-designer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design a classroom activity for students to detect AI distortions in their domain of expertise?

An AI literacy activity helps students use genuine domain expertise to identify AI distortions and omissions. By activating prior knowledge before querying AI, learners compare their expertise directly against AI output, producing durable skepticism through structured interrogation and distortion annotation rather than generic warnings.

What is the best way to help students identify systematic AI limitations using their own knowledge?

Helping students identify AI limitations requires comparing their genuine expertise against AI outputs using a structured distortion taxonomy. This Skill generates calibrated interrogation questions and annotation codes so students can classify specific distortion types and synthesize patterns of AI overconfidence or omission across different domains.

How do I structure a discussion facilitation guide for analyzing AI literacy results in a classroom?

Structuring a discussion facilitation guide for AI literacy involves creating prompts for group synthesis of detected distortions. This Skill generates a complete discussion guide that helps learners classify distortion patterns, compare surface factual verification with deeper nuance checks, and share evidence of systematic AI limitations across various student-chosen expertise domains.

Can I use this AI literacy activity for any student expertise domain and education level?

Yes, you can generate a calibrated AI interrogation activity for any student expertise domain and education level. You simply provide the specific student expertise domain and student level, and the Skill adapts the expertise activation protocol, distortion taxonomy, and discussion guide to fit those classroom parameters.

What is an expertise activation protocol for AI literacy and why is it needed?

An expertise activation protocol requires students to document what they already know about their chosen domain before interacting with AI. This creates a direct reference point to compare against AI output, ensuring that detected distortions and omissions are grounded in the learner's actual knowledge rather than generic assumptions.