ai_instruction_formatting

Format LLM instruction content into pseudo-XML with snake_case tags.

38|7|Updated May 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/theafh/ai-modules --skill ai-instruction-formatting
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai_instruction_formatting
Source: https://github.com/theafh/ai-modules/tree/main/plugins/ai_dev/skills/ai_instruction_formatting
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/theafh/ai-modules --skill ai-instruction-formatting

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you organize any LLM-consumed content into a consistent pseudo-XML structure so the model can reliably interpret roles, policies, inputs, and output contracts instead of relying on ambiguous prose ordering.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pseudo-XML tagging for instruction clarity: Wrap semantic concerns in dedicated snake_case tags like <role>, <policy>, <inputs>, and <output_contract>.
  • Works across many host artifacts: Applies to SKILL.md files, agent definitions, command/rules documents, or any instruction snippet consumed at inference time.
  • Supports multiple file shapes: Handles prose-only markdown, full XML instruction bodies, tutorials with xml fenced examples, and mixed-agent documents with multiple top-level wrappers.
  • Mechanical validation via bundled linter: Includes a deterministic linter that enforces structural correctness (naming, balancing, depth limits, and tag-structure constraints).

Quick Start

Ask an AI to format your existing system prompt or rule document into pseudo-XML using tags for role, objective, policy, inputs, steps, examples, and an output contract, then validate the result with scripts/lint_pseudo_xml.py.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai_instruction_formatting

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I format LLM system prompts into pseudo-XML for better instruction structuring?

Format LLM system prompts into pseudo-XML by wrapping semantic concerns in dedicated snake_case tags like <role>, <policy>, <inputs>, and <output_contract> so the model reliably interprets instructions instead of relying on ambiguous prose ordering.

What is pseudo-XML instruction structuring and when do I need it for agent workflows?

Pseudo-XML instruction structuring organizes inference-time artifacts like agent definitions and rule files into self-describing tags. You need it when agent workflows require consistent structure to enforce roles, constraints, and output contracts.

Does the pseudo-XML linter enforce structural constraints like nesting depth and tag balancing?

Yes, the bundled deterministic linter enforces structural correctness including frontmatter alignment, H1 presence, explicit open/close tags, balanced nesting with a maximum depth of five, and naming constraints to prevent structural violations.

What's the best way to structure mixed-agent documents with multiple top-level pseudo-XML wrappers?

Structure mixed-agent documents by applying pseudo-XML tags to handle multiple top-level wrappers, allowing diverse file shapes like prose-only markdown, full XML instruction bodies, and tutorials with fenced examples to coexist consistently.

Why does my prompt formatting fail policy constraints when using ambiguous prose ordering?

Prompt formatting fails policy constraints because ambiguous prose ordering prevents reliable interpretation. Using explicit pseudo-XML tags for policies and output contracts enforces mechanical rules that resolve structural violations.