ai-lmr-guard

Evaluate and gate personal AI actions using LMR risk criteria.

Updated Feb 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/buzzlyhan/lmr-ai-charter --skill ai-lmr-guard
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai-lmr-guard
Source: https://github.com/buzzlyhan/lmr-ai-charter/tree/main/ai-lmr-guard
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/buzzlyhan/lmr-ai-charter --skill ai-lmr-guard

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluate and gate personal AI actions using LMR risk criteria to prevent unsafe execution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • LMR-based decisioning with a two-layer architecture (LLM intent analysis and rule-based guard).
  • Lane separation to distinguish consultation vs execution and reduce overreach.
  • Step-up authentication and hard block safeguards for high-risk operations.
  • Safe handling of destructive actions like deletion or data erasure with explicit confirmation requirements.

Quick Start

Load SKILL.md in this directory as a Claude skill and proceed to execute only after explicit user confirmation for high-risk actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai-lmr-guard

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent unsafe execution when automating personal AI actions like data deletion?

To prevent unsafe execution of personal AI actions, you can apply LMR-based guardrails that evaluate risk criteria and gate destructive operations. This separates consultation from execution, requiring explicit confirmation before proceeding with high-risk tasks like data deletion or credential changes.

How do I set up step-up authentication for high-risk AI operations?

Step-up authentication for high-risk AI operations is implemented through a two-layer architecture combining LLM intent analysis and a rule-based guard. This gates destructive actions by requiring explicit user confirmation and applying hard blocks when risk scoring thresholds are exceeded.

Do I need a two-layer architecture to implement AI guardrails for external requests?

A two-layer architecture is used to implement AI guardrails by combining LLM intent analysis with a rule-based guard. This setup effectively evaluates external requests, separates consultation from execution, and applies step-up authentication to prevent unsafe over-automation.

What are the limitations of using LMR risk scoring for personal AI execution gating?

LMR risk scoring limitations include the potential for false positives in intent analysis and the strict requirement for explicit confirmation on destructive actions. Shadow-mode logging helps mitigate these limits, but hard blocks may still halt legitimate high-risk operations.