ai-records-retention

AI prompts and outputs can qualify as public records depending on their use case classification. This Skill identifies which AI-generated content meets public records criteria and flags prompts and logs that require retention scheduling.

You can map AI use cases by classifying each by record type, such as administrative, legal, or financial. The Skill applies existing retention schedules to AI-produced content and generates a city-wide retention map with storage locations and retrieval methods.

Vendor data logs require careful consideration for AI-generated public records. The Skill flags vendor data-log considerations, identifies gaps in current retention coverage, and provides action items for attorneys and IT to implement proper vendor data management.

AI-generated records under legal holds must be flagged and managed separately from standard retention schedules. The Skill identifies records that may require holds and provides clear guidance for legal review and compliance action items.

Yes, the Skill produces a city-wide retention map covering all AI use cases. It applies retention rules by document type across administrative, official, legal, and financial categories, ensuring comprehensive coverage for municipal compliance.

Existing retention schedules may have gaps when applied to AI-generated content. The Skill flags these gaps, identifies prompts and logs that may not fit current categories, and provides action items for attorneys and IT to address retention coverage limitations.