ai-security-agent

Test AI and LLM applications for adversarial security weaknesses.

54|5|Updated May 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jinyimeng01/mastermind-bug-bounty --skill ai-security-agent
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai-security-agent
Source: https://github.com/jinyimeng01/mastermind-bug-bounty/tree/main/agents/ai_security
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jinyimeng01/mastermind-bug-bounty --skill ai-security-agent

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps security teams identify and validate vulnerabilities in AI-powered applications, preventing prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, and unsafe agent behavior.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • AI Attack Surface Testing: Evaluates chatbots, RAG systems, AI agents, tool calling workflows, and model services for security weaknesses.
  • Adversarial Security Checks: Tests prompt injection, system prompt extraction, jailbreak attempts, context leakage, and permission abuse scenarios.
  • Use Case: A security researcher assessing an AI customer support chatbot can use this Skill to discover whether attackers can manipulate responses or access restricted information.

Quick Start

Use the ai security skill to test this AI application for prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool abuse, and data leakage vulnerabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai-security-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I test my LLM application for prompt injection attacks?

To test an LLM application for prompt injection attacks, you can apply structured adversarial testing scenarios that evaluate whether attackers can manipulate responses or access restricted information. This validates security weaknesses in chatbot, RAG, and agent workflows.

What is the best way to check for jailbreak vulnerabilities in RAG systems?

The best way to check for jailbreak vulnerabilities in RAG systems is by running targeted adversarial security checks. This involves testing system prompt extraction, context leakage, and permission abuse scenarios to identify exploitable weaknesses.

Can I assess tool calling workflows for unsafe agent behavior and data leakage?

Yes, you can assess tool calling workflows for unsafe agent behavior and data leakage by evaluating AI attack surfaces. This process tests permission abuse, tool manipulation, and AI data leakage risks within model services.

Does AI security testing cover system prompt exposure and permission abuse?

AI security testing covers system prompt exposure and permission abuse by validating security weaknesses through adversarial attack scenarios. It identifies whether attackers can extract system prompts or bypass access controls in LLM applications.

Why does my AI customer support chatbot need adversarial security checks?

AI customer support chatbots need adversarial security checks to prevent attackers from manipulating responses or accessing restricted information. Testing for prompt injection, jailbreaks, and data leakage validates the chatbot's resistance to malicious inputs.

What limitations exist when testing MCP and model services for AI data leakage?

Testing MCP and model services for AI data leakage requires structured testing of adversarial scenarios to identify weaknesses. Limitations depend on the specific model service configurations and the scope of the simulated attack scenarios applied.