ai-socratic-dialogue-designer

What problem does it solve?

It helps teachers design a structured multi-round questioning activity that reveals whether an AI’s answer changes due to genuine logical concession or due to sycophantic capitulation after student pushback.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Multi-round Socratic interrogation design: Produces a repeatable sequence (baseline → evidence probe → assumption probe → perspective challenge → optional pushback test) tailored to how AI responses drift.
• Answer drift tracking protocol: Gives students a simple table and guidance for recording changes in position, evidence, certainty language, and reasoning shifts across rounds.
• Capitulation taxonomy for interpretation: Classifies observed behaviors (e.g., pure agreement, partial retreat, certainty softening) and contrasts them with genuine logical updates.
• Use cases: Best for AI-literacy lessons where students must evaluate whether “the AI agreed after I argued” actually means they provided a logical reason.

Quick Start

Use the ai-socratic-dialogue-designer skill to generate a 4–5 round AI questioning sequence for the claim the students will probe, including a drift-tracker template and a capitulation-vs-update debrief guide.