aia-generation

AI impact assessment generation maps your proposed or existing AI system descriptions against Chinese AI governance rules to produce a risk rating, compliance evaluation report, and remediation actions. It aligns your system inventory with required regulatory obligations for algorithm filing.

AI risk assessment tracks differentiate by deployment scope: fast evaluation suits internal low-risk tools, while comprehensive evaluation targets high-risk deployments and material system changes. Both generate regulator-aligned risk ratings with mapped obligations and execution-ready remediation plans.

Ethics review triggers for AI regulatory compliance activate during comprehensive evaluations of high-risk deployments or significant scope changes. The assessment output includes optional ethics review flags based on the configured compliance register and system inventory risk level.

Compliance evaluation reports support periodic AI system recertification by generating regulator-aligned determinations with evidence gaps, responsible owners, and due dates. They apply directly to internal audits and deployment scope changes requiring updated impact assessments.

Regulatory obligations mapping applies your configured compliance register and system inventory to evaluate AI systems against applicable Chinese AI governance rules. It produces a risk rating with mapped obligations, evidence gaps, and execution-ready remediation actions.