aif-verify

Plan-to-implementation verification audits completed software implementations against a project plan by analyzing code changes, builds, tests, and documentation to ensure conformity to expected quality standards and surface completeness gaps.

To check for missed tasks, run a plan-to-implementation audit on the project branch. This compares the task checklist with actual code changes and test outcomes, generating a structured verification report with per-task status and follow-up actions.

Generating a structured verification report requires a plan file and a task checklist. The process analyzes code changes, builds, tests, and documentation across the project branch to output a clear status of each task along with recommended follow-ups.

Yes, consistency checks detect drift between described tasks and implemented artifacts by comparing plan tasks with actual code changes, build results, and test outcomes, highlighting gaps for remediation across the project branch.

You need a plan-to-implementation audit when you want to validate completed software implementations against the project plan. It ensures nothing was missed and confirms conformity to expected quality standards across the project branch.

The best way to audit implementation completeness is to run a verification workflow that compares task checklists against actual code changes, build results, and test outcomes, outputting a clear status of each task with recommended follow-ups.