aif-verify

Audit completed implementation against plan tasks, tests, and documentation.

56|3|Updated Mar 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lee-to/ai-workspace --skill aif-verify-lee-to
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aif-verify
Source: https://github.com/lee-to/ai-workspace/tree/main/.claude/skills/aif-verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lee-to/ai-workspace --skill aif-verify-lee-to

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Verifies that a completed implementation aligns with the planned scope by auditing task completion, building artifacts, running tests, and comparing documentation against the expected plan. It also enforces consistency with project context gates and surfaces actionable remediation steps when gaps are detected.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Plan-vs-implementation audit: checks that all plan tasks are implemented and correctly mapped to code, tests, and docs.
  • Build, test, and quality validation: ensures the project compiles, tests pass, and linting standards are met.
  • Context-gate compliance: evaluates architecture, rules, and roadmap gates to flag drift or violations.
  • Verification reporting: generates a structured report highlighting completeness, issues, and recommended follow-ups for fixes or verification.
  • Use case: a team runs /aif-verify after a feature completes to confirm all requirements are satisfied before merge.

Quick Start

Run the verification workflow to produce a complete report on the current branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about aif-verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify completed code matches the implementation plan?

To verify completed code matches the implementation plan, run a plan-vs-implementation audit that checks task completion, code quality, and documentation consistency. It evaluates contextual gates, reports detected gaps, and suggests actionable remediation steps for fixes.

What is the best way to automate build and test validation before a merge?

Automating build and test validation before a merge is done by running a workflow that ensures the project compiles, tests pass, and linting standards are met. It generates a structured verification report highlighting issues and recommended follow-ups.

How does code review check for context-gate compliance and architecture drift?

Code review checks for context-gate compliance by evaluating architecture, rules, and roadmap gates to flag drift or violations. It enforces consistency with project context and surfaces actionable remediation steps when gaps are detected.

Can I use automated quality assurance to check task completion and documentation?

Yes, you can use automated quality assurance to check task completion by auditing all planned tasks and mapping them to code, tests, and docs. It compares documentation against the expected plan and reports completeness gaps.

What should I do when code quality verification surfaces security or safety constraint issues?

When code quality verification surfaces security or safety constraint issues, it ensures those constraints are respected and surfaces actionable next steps for fixes. The structured report highlights specific gaps and recommended follow-ups for remediation.