AIMDS

Detect AI manipulation threats using temporal analysis, vector search, and formal verification.

133|39|Updated Jan 6, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/midstream --skill aimds
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: AIMDS
Source: https://github.com/ruvnet/midstream/tree/main/.claude/skills/AIMDS
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/midstream --skill aimds

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires temporal-compare, temporal-neural-solver, strange-loop, nanosecond-scheduler, quic-multistream, agentdb, lean-agentic, zod, dotenv, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you build production-grade AI manipulation defense systems by integrating Midstream's temporal analysis, AgentDB's vector search, and lean-agentic's formal verification to detect, analyze, and prove safety of AI-driven workflows, reducing risk, manual review time, and overall complexity.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Temporal Analysis: Real-time detection of manipulation attempts using high-precision temporal tools.
  • Vector Intelligence: Rapid pattern matching and risk scoring with AgentDB.
  • Formal Verification: Theorem proving to ensure safety and policy compliance before actions.
  • Use Case: A security team deploys AIMDS to monitor an AI assistant, detect adversarial prompts, and block unsafe outputs while logging proofs for audits.

Quick Start

Create a new AIMDS project structure and install dependencies as described in the Quick Start section of the SKILL.md. Start the Midstream, AgentDB, and lean-agentic services, then feed a sample input to evaluate safety; review the result and the proof trace to confirm actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about AIMDS

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect AI manipulation and adversarial prompts in real time?

Real-time AI manipulation detection uses temporal analysis to identify prompt injections, jailbreaks, and policy violations as they occur. AIMDS combines Midstream's temporal tools, AgentDB's vector search, and lean-agentic's formal verification to analyze behavioral patterns, score risk, and block unsafe outputs with audit proofs.

What's the difference between temporal analysis and vector pattern matching for AI safety?

Temporal analysis detects manipulation attempts by tracking behavioral sequences and timing anomalies with precision. Vector pattern matching rapidly scores risk by comparing input patterns against known threats in AgentDB. Combined, they enable both sequential detection and similarity-based threat recognition in production AI systems.

Can I use formal verification to prove AI outputs are safe before execution?

Yes. Formal verification with theorem proving ensures policy compliance and safety before actions execute. AIMDS integrates symbolic reasoning to generate proof traces that document why outputs are safe, providing auditable evidence for compliance reviews and security teams.

Do I need to run Midstream, AgentDB, and lean-agentic services separately?

Yes. AIMDS requires Midstream for temporal analysis, AgentDB for vector search, and lean-agentic for formal verification as separate service dependencies. Start these services before feeding inputs to evaluate safety and review proof traces.

What are the limitations of vector search for detecting novel manipulation techniques?

Vector search excels at pattern matching against known threats but may miss novel attack vectors without prior examples in memory. Temporal analysis complements this by detecting behavioral anomalies independent of historical patterns, reducing but not eliminating false negatives on unseen threats.

How does AIMDS reduce manual security review time for AI outputs?

AIMDS automates threat detection across prompts, jailbreaks, and policy violations, then generates formal proofs justifying safe outputs. Security teams review only flagged cases and proof traces, eliminating manual analysis of routine safe outputs and accelerating audit cycles.