aiml_fake_news-benchmark

Generate domain-diverse articles to stress-test fake-news classifiers across six misinformation domains.

934|152|Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wuyoscar/ISC-Bench --skill aiml-fake-news-benchmark
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aiml_fake_news-benchmark
Source: https://github.com/wuyoscar/ISC-Bench/tree/main/templates/aiml_fake_news
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wuyoscar/ISC-Bench --skill aiml-fake-news-benchmark

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the benchmarking of fake-news detectors by generating and evaluating domain-diverse articles to assess robustness against adversarial content.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated multi-domain benchmarking across six misinformation domains (public_health, election_interference, financial_manipulation, military_disinfo, science_denial, fabricated_event).
  • YAML frontmatter driven metadata for easy discovery and integration, plus prompt variants to support few-shot and zeroshot setups for evaluation.
  • Use Case: Research teams can run repeatable detector evaluations, compare models, and quantify false positive/negative rates in controlled settings.

Quick Start

Run the benchmark on the target fake-news classifier using the provided dataset and prompts to obtain a domain-coverage report.

Frequently Asked Questions about aiml_fake_news-benchmark

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I benchmark a fake-news classifier across different misinformation domains?

To benchmark a fake-news classifier across domains, you generate domain-diverse articles spanning six misinformation areas and evaluate the detector to quantify false positive and false negative rates.

What is domain-adversarial evaluation in ML safety research?

Domain-adversarial evaluation in ML safety research tests a model's robustness by generating adversarial content across diverse domains like public health, election interference, and financial manipulation to assess detection reliability.

Can I run zero-shot and few-shot prompt variants for fake-news detector evaluation?

Yes, you can run zero-shot and few-shot prompt variants for fake-news detector evaluation, utilizing YAML frontmatter driven metadata to support controlled setups for repeatable model comparisons.

Does this benchmarking tool cover science denial and military disinformation datasets?

Yes, this benchmarking tool covers science denial and military disinformation datasets, evaluating classifier robustness across six defined domains including public health, election interference, and fabricated events.

How do I get a domain-coverage report for my fake-news detection model?

To get a domain-coverage report, run the benchmark on your target fake-news classifier using the provided dataset and prompts to evaluate its performance across multiple misinformation domains.

What are the limitations of using automated stress-testing for fake-news detection?

Automated stress-testing for fake-news detection is limited to controlled settings with generated articles, meaning evaluation results quantify model robustness against adversarial content but may not reflect real-world misinformation velocity.