One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rodrigo-altissimo/qiartificial --skill aiox-qa-rodrigo-altissimo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aiox-qa
Source: https://github.com/rodrigo-altissimo/qiartificial/tree/main/.claude/skills/AIOX/agents/qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rodrigo-altissimo/qiartificial --skill aiox-qa-rodrigo-altissimo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps teams verify that stories, code changes, and tests meet quality expectations by performing structured reviews, risk assessment, and quality gate decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive QA Reviews: Run review workflows for a specific story, including structured multi-phase analysis and gate recommendations.
  • Risk & NFR Validation: Assess risk profiles and validate non-functional requirements (e.g., security, performance, reliability) with targeted checks.
  • Evidence and Traceability: Verify evidence-based requirements and map requirements to tests using Given-When-Then patterns to improve coverage and debuggability.
  • Outcome-Guided Fix Requests: Generate QA fix request artifacts for developers while constraining edits to the allowed QA Results section.

Quick Start

Use the QA agent to review a story by running: review STORY-ID

Frequently Asked Questions about aiox-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a QA review and generate quality gate decisions for a specific story?

To perform a QA review, run the command review STORY-ID against your story. This triggers a structured multi-phase analysis that assesses test architecture, validates risk profiles, and outputs deterministic quality gate decisions.

What is requirements traceability and how does it map to tests using Given-When-Then patterns?

Requirements traceability verifies evidence-based requirements by mapping them to tests using Given-When-Then patterns. This mechanism improves test coverage and debuggability by ensuring every story expectation has corresponding test evidence.

How do I validate non-functional requirements like security and performance during story readiness review?

Non-functional requirements validation occurs during the story readiness review by applying targeted checks for security, performance, and reliability. This assesses the story's risk profile to ensure it meets quality expectations before progression.

Can I use this to generate actionable QA fix requests without modifying the entire story?

Yes, you can generate outcome-guided QA fix request artifacts for developers while strictly constraining edits to the allowed QA Results section. This ensures the rest of your story documentation remains untouched and stable.

Does this quality gate review process support deterministic workflows with constrained story updates?

The quality gate review process satisfies deterministic review workflows by constraining story updates exclusively to the QA Results section. It provides reliable gate decisions and evidence generation without altering external story content.

What is the best way to assess risk profiles and verify evidence for story readiness?

The best way to assess risk profiles is to execute a comprehensive QA review workflow for the specific story. This validates non-functional requirements, checks security scans, and generates actionable QA decisions for readiness.