aireview

Coordinate five AI models to evaluate Bottie's autoresearch loop and synthesize findings.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Liquilab/Bottie --skill aireview-liquilab
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aireview
Source: https://github.com/Liquilab/Bottie/tree/main/.claude/skills/aireview
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Liquilab/Bottie --skill aireview-liquilab

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Bottie’s autoreview workflow requires an objective, reproducible cross-review of its AI-search loop, coordinating multiple models to surface high-impact improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Cross-model evaluation across Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.2, Codex 5.3, and Perplexity to produce a unified assessment.
  • Objective synthesis of findings with actionable improvement recommendations.
  • Support for regression checks and traceability to code, logs, and hypotheses.

Quick Start

Run a full 5-model cross-review to obtain an objective synthesis of Bottie's autoresearch results.

Frequently Asked Questions about aireview

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a cross-model AI review for an autoresearch loop?

Cross-model AI review coordinates Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.2, Codex 5.3, and Perplexity to evaluate autoresearch loops. It applies standardized criteria to identify gaps and risks, synthesizing findings into objective assessments with actionable improvement suggestions.

What is multi-model synthesis for AI search workflows?

Multi-model synthesis aggregates evaluations from multiple AI models into a unified assessment. It quantifies findings, identifies risks and opportunities in AI search loops, and delivers concrete improvement suggestions traceable to relevant code, data, and logs.

Can I use cross-model evaluation to trace AI review findings back to code and logs?

Cross-model evaluation supports regression checks and traceability by mapping synthesized findings directly to relevant code, logs, and hypotheses. This ensures objective improvement recommendations remain grounded in verifiable system data.

Does multi-model AI review work for identifying gaps and risks in automated research?

Multi-model AI review applies standardized criteria to automated research workflows to identify gaps, risks, and opportunities. It quantifies findings where possible to produce objective system reviews that drive concrete, actionable improvements.

Why coordinate multiple AI models instead of a single model for system review?

Coordinating multiple AI models produces an objective, reproducible cross-review by balancing individual model biases. This multi-model synthesis surfaces high-impact improvements that a single model assessment might miss.

What are the limitations of using multi-model synthesis for autoresearch evaluation?

Multi-model synthesis requires coordinating five separate AI models, which introduces dependency on each model's availability and response consistency. The evaluation is limited to the standardized criteria applied and the quality of the provided code, logs, and data.