alignment-play

Coordinate multi-expert alignment dialogues to deliberate RFC decisions.

1|1|Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/superviber/blue --skill alignment-play
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: alignment-play
Source: https://github.com/superviber/blue/tree/main/skills/alignment-play
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/superviber/blue --skill alignment-play

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinates and runs multi-expert alignment dialogues to deliberate RFC decisions, reducing misalignment and decision drift across teams.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates an N+1 expert panel for RFC deliberation with Core, Adjacent, and Wildcard perspectives.
  • Supports a judge-driven panel evolution after each round, including retention, pool expansion, and dynamic expert creation.
  • Provides tooling guidance and artifact structure to ensure reproducible discussions and convergence tracking.

Quick Start

Provide a topic to start an alignment dialogue and let the Judge orchestrate the expert panel.

Frequently Asked Questions about alignment-play

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate multi-expert alignment for RFC architecture decisions?

Multi-expert RFC alignment is coordinated by running a judge-driven dialogue workflow that orchestrates Core, Adjacent, and Wildcard expert panel perspectives to deliberate architecture decisions. This reduces decision drift by evolving the panel dynamically across discussion rounds.

What is a judge-driven panel evolution workflow for cross-team alignment?

A judge-driven panel evolution workflow is an RFC deliberation process where a Judge orchestrates an expert pool, applying retention, pool expansion, and dynamic expert creation after each dialogue round to ensure cross-team alignment and convergence tracking.

How do I start an alignment dialogue for an engineering architecture review?

To start an alignment dialogue, provide a specific RFC topic or architecture review subject. The Judge will then initialize the multi-expert panel and begin orchestrating the deliberation rounds to track convergence and generate reproducible artifacts.

Can I use multi-expert dialogue for cross-team alignment sessions across multiple engineering projects?

Yes, multi-expert dialogue supports cross-team alignment sessions across engineering projects by utilizing an N+1 expert panel with standardized artifact structures and tooling guidance to ensure reproducible discussions and reduce misalignment.

What's the best way to track decision convergence during RFC design deliberations?

The best way to track convergence during RFC design is using a standardized file structure for artifact writing alongside a judge-driven panel evolution process that applies retention and dynamic expert creation after each round prompt.

When should I not use a multi-expert panel for architecture reviews?

You should avoid multi-expert panels for simple architecture reviews that lack cross-team dependencies or design complexity, as the overhead of orchestrating dynamic expert creation and multiple dialogue rounds is intended for reducing significant decision drift.