amoa-verification-patterns

Generate evidence-based JSON verification reports for implemented code and systems.

13|Updated Mar 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Emasoft/ai-maestro-orchestrator-agent --skill amoa-verification-patterns
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: amoa-verification-patterns
Source: https://github.com/Emasoft/ai-maestro-orchestrator-agent/tree/main/skills/amoa-verification-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Emasoft/ai-maestro-orchestrator-agent --skill amoa-verification-patterns

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Ensure implementations meet acceptance criteria by providing reproducible, evidence-based verification workflows that collect measurable proof and prevent assumptions from being accepted as completion.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence Collection & Formatting: Standardized evidence items (exit codes, test results, file content) and verification records suitable for orchestrator handoff.
  • Validation & Enforcement: Automated validation of evidence format and minimum evidence requirements with clear error reporting.
  • Testing & Reporting Tools: CLI tools for running checks, generating test reports, analyzing A/B tests, and compiling verification summaries for CI/CD and GitHub issue integration.
  • Use Case: Run automated verification on a completed task to produce a JSON verification report containing at least two evidence items, a pass/fail status, and actionable failure details for orchestrator consumption.

Quick Start

Run the verification checklist, collect at least two evidence items (e.g., exit code and test report), validate the verification record, and produce a JSON report ready for orchestrator handoff.

Frequently Asked Questions about amoa-verification-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate evidence-based verification reports for CI/CD validation?

Evidence-based verification reports for CI/CD validation are generated by collecting structured evidence like exit codes, test results, and file contents, then formatting them into orchestrator-ready JSON records with a pass/fail status.

What is the best way to collect structured test evidence for task completion verification?

Collecting structured test evidence for task completion verification involves running automated checks to capture exit codes and test reports, enforcing minimum evidence requirements, and compiling the results into a standardized JSON verification record.

Can I use automated verification workflows to enforce minimum evidence requirements?

Yes, automated verification workflows enforce minimum evidence requirements by validating the evidence format during test-suite runs and integration workflows, providing clear error reporting when acceptance criteria are not met.

Does verification report generation work with GitHub issue integration and CI/CD pipelines?

Verification report generation works with GitHub issue integration and CI/CD pipelines by using CLI tools to run checks, analyze A/B tests, and compile verification summaries into JSON records suitable for orchestrator handoff.

Why does my verification report fail validation during implementation handoff?

Verification report validation fails during implementation handoff when the collected evidence items do not meet the minimum evidence requirements or the structured data fails the required format validation checks.

Do I need to run test-suite workflows before producing JSON verification records?

Yes, running test-suite workflows before producing JSON verification records is required to gather at least two evidence items, such as exit codes and test results, ensuring the final report contains measurable proof of completion.