What problem does it solve? Mexican amparo litigation requires locating, verifying, and organizing jurisprudence and legal sources without delegating the interpretive legal argument to AI. This Skill enforces a copilot architecture where the AI locates and verifies sources while the lawyer writes the argument, preventing fabricated citations, superseded criteria, and unverified claims from reaching a court filing. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Fundamentar mode: A seven-phase workflow (case intake, attack routes, parallel source collection, mandatory source gate, diffuse control, argument scaffold, adversarial contrast) for lawyers who know what to request but need verified legal grounding. - Viabilidad mode: Pre-lawsuit triage covering the challenged act, authority, legal interest, definitiveness, admissibility (art. 61 LA), and the applicable deadline rule without calculating dates. - Five-axis source gate: Every cited source is verified for existence, validity, binding scope (art. 217 LA), literal textual correspondence, and pertinence (which is never evaluated, as it belongs to the lawyer). - Use Case: A lawyer preparing an amparo against a pretrial detention order uses the skill to locate binding SCJN criteria for their circuit, run a mandatory adverse-source round, and receive a violation-concept scaffold with the interpretive sections left empty for them to write. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to help you ground an amparo lawsuit by describing the challenged act, the authority, and the right you claim was violated.
