analise-inicial-cobrancas-bradesco

Validate Bradesco initial petitions by cross-checking action type, data, and annexes.

1|Updated May 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gabrielcardosodeaguiar45-oss/claude-skills-azevedolima --skill analise-inicial-cobrancas-bradesco
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analise-inicial-cobrancas-bradesco
Source: https://github.com/gabrielcardosodeaguiar45-oss/claude-skills-azevedolima/tree/main/analise-inicial-cobrancas-bradesco
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gabrielcardosodeaguiar45-oss/claude-skills-azevedolima --skill analise-inicial-cobrancas-bradesco

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps legal teams perform a pre-filing review of a Word lawsuit petition against BANCO BRADESCO S.A. for improper charges, ensuring the document is consistent with the attached extract and calculations and that model placeholders and adaptation errors are caught before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pre-protocol checklist across 10 validation axes: verifies action type/rubric/IRDR alignment, plaintiff identity and eligibility (including priority for elderly), territorial jurisdiction match, defendant identification, account and period coherence, proxy specificity, prior notice evidence, OAB/template correctness, and model adaptation integrity.
  • Automated cross-checking with evidence files: compares the stated period/quantity/total against the extract and compares the total/line counts against the provided calculation table.
  • Safety against template mistakes: detects placeholders (e.g., Jinja tokens, empty fields, generic comarca) and model adaptation issues (gender/plural mismatches, wrong references).
  • Generates office-standard deliverables: produces two DOCX outputs—one conference report and one “editions suggested” document—with concrete, anchored editing instructions for the collaborator to apply mechanically in Word.

Quick Start

Use the analise-inicial-cobrancas-bradesco skill on the client folder containing the petition Word file and the supporting PDFs/XLSX (extract, table, RG, proxy, and notification/AR), then it will generate a conference report DOCX and an edits-suggestions DOCX with the most critical corrections highlighted.

Frequently Asked Questions about analise-inicial-cobrancas-bradesco

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a legal petition against Bradesco for improper account charges before filing?

Pre-filing petition review for improper account charges involves cross-checking the Word document against PDF extracts and calculation tables. It validates action type, plaintiff identity, rubric alignment, and account period coherence to detect inconsistencies before protocol submission.

What is placeholder detection in legal petition templates?

Placeholder detection in legal petition templates identifies Jinja tokens, empty fields, and generic comarca references. It catches model adaptation failures like gender or plural mismatches and incorrect references, ensuring template integrity before court submission.

Can I generate a DOCX conference report with suggested edits for a Word lawsuit petition?

Yes, you can generate a DOCX conference report and an edits-suggested document from a Word lawsuit petition. The outputs provide concrete, anchored editing instructions derived from evidence cross-checking, allowing collaborators to apply corrections mechanically in Word.

Does pre-protocol petition review work with specific Bradesco rubrics like Mora Cred Pess and Tarifas?

Yes, pre-protocol petition review supports specific Bradesco rubrics including Mora Cred Pess, Tarifas, Título de Capitalização, APLIC.INVEST FACIL, PG ELETRON, and combined PI. It validates rubric alignment by cross-checking action types against provided extract documents and calculation tables.

Why does petition review block submission when critical divergences are found?

Petition review blocks submission when critical divergences are found to enforce safety guardrails against template mistakes and evidence mismatches. This prevents filing lawsuits with incorrect totals, period inconsistencies, or placeholder failures that could compromise the case.

What documents do I need for automated cross-checking of a Bradesco lawsuit petition?

For automated cross-checking of a Bradesco lawsuit petition, you need the client folder containing the petition Word file, supporting PDFs, and XLSX files. Required documents include the bank extract, calculation table, RG, proxy, and notification or AR evidence.