analyst

Review engineering artifacts using a four-lens framework and output structured feedback.

3|1|Updated Feb 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vxcozy/architect-system --skill analyst-vxcozy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analyst
Source: https://github.com/vxcozy/architect-system/tree/main/.claude/skills/analyst
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vxcozy/architect-system --skill analyst-vxcozy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Senior engineering analysts bridge the gap between design, implementation, and operation by rigorously evaluating artifacts across multiple dimensions to surface issues before they ship.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four-lens review framework: architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance to ensure holistic quality.
  • Reads blueprint outputs and source code, then outputs actionable feedback to system/reviews/ for governance.
  • Suitable for blueprint reviews from /architect, post-implementation quality checks, and plan validation before task completion.

Quick Start

Instruct the analyst to load the active blueprint or code artifact and perform a four-lens review, delivering a structured assessment and recommended actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about analyst

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a multi-lens engineering review for architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance?

To perform a multi-lens engineering review, load the active blueprint or code artifact and apply a four-lens framework covering architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance to generate actionable findings.

What is the best way to validate blueprint outputs before shipping a design?

Validating blueprint outputs requires loading relevant system state, lessons, and standards, then evaluating the artifact across architecture, quality, reliability, and performance dimensions to determine its readiness.

How do I automate post-implementation quality checks for source code?

Automating post-implementation quality checks involves reviewing the implemented source code against a four-lens framework to surface actionable feedback, which is then output to system reviews for governance.

Can I use this approach to review both design blueprints and automation outputs?

Yes, this approach evaluates engineering artifacts including design blueprints, source code, and automation outputs, applying a four-lens review framework to determine suitability and readiness before shipping.

How does the code review process handle system state and governance recording?

The code review process loads relevant system state, lessons, and standards to evaluate the artifact, then outputs structured feedback to system reviews directories for recording and governance purposes.