analyze

Analyze ambiguous investigative problems with structured analytic techniques and cited evidence.

48|5|Updated Apr 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/assafkip/huntkit --skill analyze-assafkip
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analyze
Source: https://github.com/assafkip/huntkit/tree/main/skills/structured-analysis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/assafkip/huntkit --skill analyze-assafkip

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you make defensible decisions when the answer is unclear, the evidence is mixed, or multiple explanations compete.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured hypothesis testing: Compare competing explanations instead of settling on the first plausible answer.
  • Adversarial stress-testing: Challenge assumptions, search for contradictions, and identify blind spots before you finalize a judgment.
  • Evidence-backed reporting: Produce cited assessments, monitoring plans, and iteration-ready analysis artifacts for research, intelligence, and high-stakes decision support.

Quick Start

Use the analyze skill to clarify the question, test assumptions, and produce a cited assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about analyze

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I test competing hypotheses in intelligence analysis?

Structured analytic techniques clarify ambiguous investigative problems by applying evidence-based reasoning, scenario building, and adversarial stress-testing to ensure defensible decision support.

Can I use structured analysis for OSINT and threat assessment research?

Structured analysis applies to OSINT, threat assessment, and due diligence by tracking cited evidence, identifying blind spots, and producing iteration-ready assessments for high-stakes research tasks.

How do I write an evidence-backed intelligence report with confidence calibration?

Structured analysis applies to OSINT, threat assessment, and due diligence by tracking cited evidence, identifying blind spots, and producing iteration-ready assessments for high-stakes research tasks.

What is the best way to challenge assumptions in an investigative analysis?

Evidence-backed report generation requires cited evidence tracking, iterative artifact creation, assumptions documentation, and confidence calibration to produce defensible analytical judgments.

Does structured analysis work for ambiguous problems with mixed evidence?

Adversarial stress-testing challenges assumptions by actively searching for contradictions and identifying blind spots before finalizing a judgment, ensuring your analysis remains defensible.