analyze

Analyze topics using MECE frameworks and repository evidence to produce conclusions.

2|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/avav25/ai-assets --skill analyze-avav25
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analyze
Source: https://github.com/avav25/ai-assets/tree/main/.windsurf/skills/analyze
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/avav25/ai-assets --skill analyze-avav25

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This analysis workflow enables clear, replicable investigations by translating ambiguous requests into structured, evidence-backed conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Frame the analysis with a defined subject, scope, audience, and success criteria.
  • Select relevant analytical frameworks (e.g., SWOT, MECE, hypothesis-driven analysis) and plan investigations across mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive dimensions.
  • Collect and synthesize evidence from repository artifacts, metrics, and targeted sources, then present findings with quantified conclusions, recommendations, and risk notes.
  • Use cases include product evaluations, architectural reviews, market research, and strategic comparisons.

Quick Start

Provide a structured analysis of a defined topic by specifying subject, scope, and desired outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions about analyze

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform structured analysis on an ambiguous topic using MECE principles?

Structured analysis using MECE principles breaks ambiguous requests into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive dimensions to plan investigations and produce evidence-backed conclusions. It translates vague requests into clear, replicable findings.

What is the best way to select an analytical framework for an architectural review?

Selecting an analytical framework for an architectural review involves evaluating options like SWOT or hypothesis-driven analysis against your defined scope and audience. The correct framework structures the investigation and aligns with success criteria.

How do I start an evidence-based analysis when I only have repository artifacts?

To start an evidence-based analysis with repository artifacts, define your subject, scope, and desired outcomes first. The workflow then synthesizes these artifacts and metrics to generate quantified conclusions and risk notes.

Can I use this approach for strategic comparisons and market research?

Yes, you can use this evidence-based analysis approach for strategic comparisons and market research. It frames the analysis with defined success criteria and synthesizes collected evidence to present actionable recommendations.

What limitations exist when relying on repository artifacts for decision support?

A limitation of relying on repository artifacts for decision support is that evidence collection is constrained to available artifacts and targeted sources. You must consider risk notes carefully, as conclusions are quantified strictly from these synthesized inputs.

Does the analysis workflow include risk considerations in its final output?

Yes, the analysis workflow includes risk considerations in its final output. It presents findings with quantified conclusions, actionable recommendations, and explicit risk notes to ensure comprehensive evidence-based decision support.