analyze-results

Parse JSON/CSV ML experiment outputs into comparable statistics and numbered findings.

Updated May 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lightrain-a/medtrace-aris --skill analyze-results-lightrain-a
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analyze-results
Source: https://github.com/lightrain-a/medtrace-aris/tree/main/.vendor/aris/skills/analyze-results
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lightrain-a/medtrace-aris --skill analyze-results-lightrain-a

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It eliminates the guesswork of interpreting machine learning experiment outputs by turning raw result files into comparable statistics and actionable findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Result discovery & parsing: Finds JSON/CSV outputs across common directories and converts them into structured tables.
  • Baseline-aware comparisons: Organizes independent/dependent variables and computes deltas versus a baseline for quick performance interpretation.
  • Statistical insight generation: Reports mean±std across seeds, identifies trends in sweeps, flags outliers, and drafts follow-up experiments.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to analyze your experiment results by providing the path or description of the folder that contains your JSON/CSV outputs.

Frequently Asked Questions about analyze-results

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze machine learning experiment results from JSON and CSV outputs?

To analyze machine learning experiment results, you parse JSON and CSV output files into structured tables, compute baseline deltas for performance comparison, and summarize mean±std across seeds to generate actionable findings.

What's the best way to compare model configurations across multi-seed hyperparameter sweeps?

The best way to compare model configurations across hyperparameter sweeps is to compute baseline deltas and summarize mean±std metrics across multiple seeds, which reveals true performance trends and flags outliers.

How does statistical reporting work for ml experiments with multiple random seeds?

Statistical reporting for ml experiments aggregates metrics across random seeds by calculating the mean and standard deviation, providing a reliable baseline comparison that captures variance and identifies true performance trends.

Can I generate follow-up experiment suggestions from raw results analysis?

Yes, results analysis can generate follow-up experiment suggestions by evaluating parameter sweep trends and baseline comparisons from your parsed outputs, drafting actionable next steps to optimize model configurations.

Do I need a specific folder structure to parse experiment result files?

No specific folder structure is strictly required, as the parsing mechanism discovers JSON and CSV outputs across common project directories, automatically converting them into structured tables for baseline-aware comparison.