analyze-results

Analyze ML experiment results to compute statistics and generate comparison tables.

Updated Jun 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xqinag/ARIS-new --skill analyze-results-xqinag
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analyze-results
Source: https://github.com/xqinag/ARIS-new/tree/main/skills/analyze-results
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xqinag/ARIS-new --skill analyze-results-xqinag

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, and generate comparison tables to uncover actionable insights.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Compute mean, standard deviation, and confidence intervals across seeds and configurations.
  • Generate comparison tables for models, hyperparameters, data splits, and metrics.
  • Produce concise insights with observations, interpretations, and implications to guide decisions.

Quick Start

Run the skill on your results directory to produce a comparison summary and key insights.

Frequently Asked Questions about analyze-results

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compute statistics and compare ML experiment results across multiple seeds?

To compute statistics for ML experiment results, aggregate metrics across seeds and configurations to calculate mean, standard deviation, and confidence intervals. This identifies metric deltas versus baselines and generates structured comparison tables.

Can I analyze JSON and CSV files to compare model hyperparameters and data splits?

Yes, you can parse JSON and CSV formats to compare models, hyperparameters, and data splits. The analysis aggregates metrics across these configurations to produce concise insights and structured comparison tables.

What is the best way to derive actionable insights from machine learning experiment suites?

The best way to derive insights from ML experiment suites is to compute statistics across configurations and identify deltas versus baselines. This generates concise observations, interpretations, and implications to guide model decisions.

Does this analysis approach work with experiment suites containing multiple configurations?

Yes, this analysis works with experiment suites containing multiple configurations. It parses JSON and CSV results to aggregate metrics, compute standard deviations, and compare model performance across different seeds and setups.

How do I generate comparison tables for machine learning metrics?

Generate comparison tables for ML metrics by parsing JSON or CSV experiment results. The process aggregates metrics across seeds, computes confidence intervals, and identifies performance deltas versus baselines to structure the tables.