What problem does it solve?
Provides a rigorous, evidence-backed evaluation of agent team session exports so teams can learn what went wrong, what worked, and how to improve future runs. It turns verbose markdown session transcripts into a focused suitability verdict, a 10-category scorecard, prioritized recommendations, and a ready-to-use improved prompt.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured Scorecard & Verdict: Generates a suitability verdict and fills a 10-category rubric with quoted evidence from the session export.
- Actionable Recommendations & Prompt Rewrite: Produces prioritized, specific changes and a copy-paste improved prompt for the next run.
- Audit & Cost Guidance: Evaluates model selection, team size, and cost-efficiency against official best practices. Use when you want post-run feedback on research/review runs, multi-agent coordination, or to debug failed parallel workflows.
Quick Start
Provide the markdown agent team session export and ask: "Analyze this team session and produce a scorecard, recommendations, and an improved prompt."