analyzing-review

Coordinates multi-agent reviews to validate analysis artifacts before development.

Updated Apr 10, 2026

Search Tags:#architecture #requirements #multi-agent #analyze #ux-review #analysis-review #feedback-synthesis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/k2works/getting-started-algorithm --skill analyzing-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analyzing-review
Source: https://github.com/k2works/getting-started-algorithm/tree/main/.agents/skills/analyzing-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/k2works/getting-started-algorithm --skill analyzing-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Analyzing artifacts such as requirements, architecture, data models, domain models, UI designs, test strategies, and non-functional and operating requirements often require diverse, independent viewpoints. This skill enables parallel reviews by XP agents to surface contradictions, gaps, and alignment issues before development proceeds.

Core Features & Use Cases

Parallel reviews by XP agents (xp-product-manager, xp-architect, xp-interaction-designer, xp-tester, xp-user-representative) to gather independent feedback.
Integrated synthesis that combines insights into a single actionable report, reducing rework and improving stakeholder alignment.
Use Case: when a project artifact needs multi-disciplinary critique to validate completeness, feasibility, and usability.

Quick Start

Launch parallel XP-agent reviews on your current analysis artifact to generate a multi-perspective feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about analyzing-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

What is multi-agent review for analysis artifacts and how does it validate requirements?▼

Multi-agent review for analysis artifacts coordinates independent XP agents like product-manager, architect, and tester to validate requirements, architecture, and UI designs, generating a consolidated report that surfaces contradictions and gaps before development proceeds.

How do I run parallel reviews on architecture and data models before development?▼

To run parallel reviews on architecture and data models, launch independent XP agents to analyze your artifacts, gather structured feedback from each role, and synthesize the inputs into a single actionable review report to improve completeness and traceability.

Can I use multi-agent feedback synthesis to review test strategies and non-functional requirements?▼

Yes, multi-agent feedback synthesis supports reviewing test strategies and non-functional requirements by engaging xp-tester and xp-user-representative agents to provide independent critique, ensuring feasibility and operational needs are validated across all project artifacts.

What's the best way to consolidate multi-disciplinary critique for UI design and domain models?▼

The best way to consolidate multi-disciplinary critique for UI design and domain models is to gather structured feedback from independent XP agents, then synthesize their inputs into a single integrated report that reduces rework and improves stakeholder alignment.

Do I need specific dependencies to coordinate multi-agent reviews for software analysis artifacts?▼

No specific dependencies are required to coordinate multi-agent reviews for software analysis artifacts. The skill operates independently to engage XP agents and generate consolidated feedback reports for requirements, architecture, and UI design validation.