answering-questions-with-research

Combine repository discovery with web research to answer questions with sourced evidence.

4|2|Updated Feb 25, 2026

Search Tags:#research #verification #discovery #repository #evidence #web #fact-check

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/LaiTszKin/apollo-toolkit --skill answering-questions-with-research

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: answering-questions-with-research
Source: https://github.com/LaiTszKin/apollo-toolkit/tree/main/answering-questions-with-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LaiTszKin/apollo-toolkit --skill answering-questions-with-research

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Complete, evidence-based answers require both local repository context and current external verification; this skill integrates discovery and web research to produce trustworthy responses.

Core Features & Use Cases

Repository-first discovery to identify relevant files and metadata.
Web verification to validate time-sensitive facts with primary sources.
Clear separation of confirmed findings and uncertainties, with source links when used.
Use Case: When asked about current project status or historical decisions that require corroborated evidence beyond code comments.

Quick Start

Ask a question and let the skill search the repository for facts, then perform web verification to return a sourced answer.

Frequently Asked Questions about answering-questions-with-research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I find evidence-based answers by searching a code repository and verifying facts on the web?▼

To find evidence-based answers, use repository discovery first to identify relevant files and metadata, then perform web verification to validate time-sensitive facts with primary sources. This separates confirmed findings from uncertainties with source links included.

What is the best way to fact-check a project's current status using repository history and external sources?▼

Fact-checking project status requires repository discovery to extract historical decisions and codebase facts, followed by web research to validate current time-sensitive information, ensuring corroborated evidence beyond code comments with clear source attribution.

How do I answer questions that require both repository facts and current external web sources?▼

Answering these questions involves searching the repository for complete facts, then performing web verification to confirm time-sensitive details, clearly separating confirmed findings from uncertainties while providing source links for all evidence used.

Can I use repository discovery and web research to get complete answers for project documentation questions?▼

Yes, repository discovery identifies relevant files and metadata for documentation, while web verification validates time-sensitive facts with primary sources. This integrated approach produces trustworthy responses with clear separation of confirmed facts and uncertainties.

What are the limitations of combining repository discovery with web verification for fact-checking?▼

This approach separates confirmed findings from uncertainties but relies on repository context and current external sources. Limitations include potential gaps when repository facts lack web corroboration or when time-sensitive facts cannot be verified through primary sources.