antipattern-detector

To detect anti-patterns in software architecture, provide your plan or proposal to the detector. It applies a predefined catalog of anti-patterns, scoring rules, and remediation templates to surface red flags and generate structured findings before decisions are committed.

Architecture anti-patterns are recurring failure patterns in technical decisions and organizational structures that surface as problems later. Identifying them during risk analysis provides evidence-based severity assessments and remediation recommendations to prevent committed errors.

Yes, you can use anti-pattern detection for team structures and roadmap validation. The detector analyzes proposals, architectures, project plans, and team configurations to identify red flags across timelines, processes, and technologies before commitment.

Yes, you need a predefined catalog of anti-patterns, scoring rules, and remediation templates to perform architecture reviews. These elements are required for the detector to produce structured findings that feed risk registers and planning discussions.

The best way to surface red flags in technical decisions is to run an anti-pattern detector on your proposals. It identifies risks across architecture, timelines, teams, and technologies, generating evidence-based severity scores and remediation recommendations.

Anti-pattern detectors handle complex project plans by applying predefined scoring rules to generate structured findings. However, they require a predefined catalog of anti-patterns and remediation templates to function, meaning detection scope is limited to the provided rules.