aoa-contract-test

Formalize interface contracts into explicit tests and smoke checks.

4|Updated Mar 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/8Dionysus/aoa-skills --skill aoa-contract-test
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aoa-contract-test
Source: https://github.com/8Dionysus/aoa-skills/tree/main/.agents/skills/aoa-contract-test
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/8Dionysus/aoa-skills --skill aoa-contract-test

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

When components interact across a meaningful boundary, the expected inputs, outputs, and verification obligations are often implicit and fragile; this skill makes those interface contracts explicit and reviewable so downstream assumptions are clear and testable.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Boundary Identification: Guide agents or humans to locate the boundary and its consumers within a codebase or service mesh.
  • Contract Expression: Translate expected inputs and outputs into concrete tests, smoke summaries, or structured checks tied to the interface rather than internals.
  • Verification & Reporting: Produce verification steps and downstream impact notes so reviewers can confirm what the validation actually proves.
  • Use Case: Strengthen a microservice interface by adding smoke tests that assert request/response shapes and document downstream assumptions for reviewers.

Quick Start

Inspect the boundary between the service and its consumer, state the expected inputs and outputs, and propose tests or smoke checks that make the contract explicit and verifiable.

Frequently Asked Questions about aoa-contract-test

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is interface contract testing and when do I need it for my services?

Interface contract testing formalizes expected inputs, outputs, and verification obligations across component boundaries. You need it when downstream assumptions are implicit and fragile, requiring explicit validation at module, service, or workflow boundaries to ensure consumers receive correct data.

How do I make interface contracts explicit between components?

To make interface contracts explicit, inspect the boundary between a service and its consumers, state expected inputs and outputs, and propose concrete tests or smoke checks tied to the interface rather than internal implementation details for verifiable downstream impact.

How do I write smoke tests that validate microservice request and response shapes?

Write smoke tests by inspecting the service boundary, stating the expected request and response shapes, and translating them into structured checks. This produces verification steps and downstream impact notes so reviewers can confirm what the validation proves.

Do I need a test harness to validate boundary contracts in my codebase?

Yes, you need a test or smoke harness to express inputs, outputs, and verification checks. The skill requires repository file access and a test harness to formalize interface contracts and validate downstream assumptions at component boundaries.

What is the best way to document downstream impact assumptions for interface consumers?

The best way to document downstream impact assumptions is to translate expected inputs and outputs into concrete verification checks tied to the interface. This produces reviewable contract expressions and structured smoke summaries clarifying what validation proves.

Why do my smoke tests keep failing after downstream service changes?

Smoke tests often fail after downstream service changes because interface contracts are implicit and fragile. Making those contracts explicit through structured checks tied to the interface ensures downstream assumptions remain clear and testable across component boundaries.