aoa-invariant-coverage-audit

Audit invariant coverage across tests, checks, and examples.

4|Updated Mar 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/8Dionysus/aoa-skills --skill aoa-invariant-coverage-audit
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aoa-invariant-coverage-audit
Source: https://github.com/8Dionysus/aoa-skills/tree/main/.agents/skills/aoa-invariant-coverage-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/8Dionysus/aoa-skills --skill aoa-invariant-coverage-audit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This guidance helps teams judge whether their test suites actually enforce stable truths rather than repeating examples, and turns findings into a bounded audit package.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Invariant mapping: links each check to the invariant it constrains.
  • Gap detection: identifies weak or missing coverage and documents bounded follow-ups.
  • Structured verification: produces a concise verdict and traceable results for audits.
  • Adaptation points: local overlays for domain-specific invariants and edge cases.

Quick Start

Provide the target invariant and your current checks to generate a bounded coverage audit with identified gaps and bounded follow-up recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about aoa-invariant-coverage-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is invariant coverage in software testing?

To audit test gaps, provide your target invariant and current checks to generate a coverage map. The audit identifies weak or missing coverage and outputs bounded follow-up recommendations to constrain stable truths.

How do I audit test gaps to verify invariant enforcement?

To audit test gaps, provide your target invariant and current checks to generate a coverage map. The audit identifies weak or missing coverage and outputs bounded follow-up recommendations to constrain stable truths.

How does manifest-backed technique traceability work for coverage audits?

Manifest-backed technique traceability enforces traceability by linking each check directly to the invariant it constrains. This structured verification produces a concise verdict and traceable results suitable for software audits.

Can I adapt coverage audits for domain-specific edge cases?

You can adapt coverage audits using local overlays for domain-specific invariants and edge cases. This allows the validation surface audit to target specific stable truths across different domains within your software.

What is the best way to identify weak validation surfaces in a test suite?

The best way to identify weak validation surfaces is an invariant coverage audit, which evaluates existing tests and examples. It produces a structured gap list and bounded follow-up checks to secure missing constraints.