apex-review

Analyze git history and diffs to generate a prioritized cross-domain risk report.

69|8|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tonone-ai/tonone --skill apex-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: apex-review
Source: https://github.com/tonone-ai/tonone/tree/main/team/apex/skills/apex-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tonone-ai/tonone --skill apex-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps engineering teams identify and bridge gaps that span multiple specialties, ensuring changes align across components, domains, and handoffs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Surface cross-domain gaps and risks by reviewing recent work (code, design, docs) and comparing it against defined cross-cutting concerns.
  • Align specialists by surfacing consistency issues, interfaces, and boundary conditions that may cause integration problems.
  • Use case: before a major release, run this review to verify that security, performance, observability, data integrity, and CI/CD hooks are coherent across teams.

Quick Start

Run apex-review on the latest merge to surface cross-domain gaps and risks.

Frequently Asked Questions about apex-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify cross-cutting code review gaps before a major release?

Cross-cutting code review gaps are identified by analyzing recent git history and diffs to synthesize inputs from security, performance, observability, and infrastructure, generating a prioritized risk report.

What is a cross-domain engineering review and when do I need one?

A cross-domain engineering review bridges gaps across specialties by checking recent work against cross-cutting concerns. You need one for pre-release checks, post-merge quality control, and cross-team handoffs.

How do I run a cross-team handoff review to surface integration risks?

Run a cross-team handoff review by analyzing recent surface-level artifacts and code diffs to surface consistency issues, interfaces, and boundary conditions that may cause integration problems across teams.

Can I check data integrity and observability gaps together in a single review?

Yes, you can check data integrity and observability gaps together. The review synthesizes viewpoints from security, performance, observability, data integrity, infrastructure, and CI/CD into one actionable report.

Does cross-domain risk analysis work on surface-level artifacts or only full code audits?

Cross-domain risk analysis works on surface-level artifacts. It analyzes recent work including git history, diffs, and surface-level artifacts to produce prioritized, cross-domain risk recommendations.

What's the best way to align engineering specialists on boundary conditions and interfaces?

The best way to align engineering specialists is to surface consistency issues, interfaces, and boundary conditions by comparing recent work against defined cross-cutting concerns to prevent integration problems.