api-and-interface-design

Design consumer-first API, SDK, event, CLI, or service boundary contracts before implementation.

Updated Apr 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vTRKA/supervibe --skill api-and-interface-design-vtrka
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: api-and-interface-design
Source: https://github.com/vTRKA/supervibe/tree/main/skills/api-and-interface-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vTRKA/supervibe --skill api-and-interface-design-vtrka

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It prevents breaking changes and confusing implementations by forcing consumer-visible interfaces (APIs, SDKs, events, CLIs, and boundaries) to be specified as explicit contracts before code hardens them.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Contract-first interface specification: Define request/response/event/method shapes, required vs optional fields, nullability, defaults, and unknown-field behavior from the consumer’s perspective.
  • Compatibility and safety decisions up front: Classify additive/deprecating/breaking changes and require versioning, migration, rollback, and consumer impact evidence when needed.
  • Operational semantics and verification: Specify errors, auth/authz declarations, idempotency and retry behavior, pagination/collection semantics, and observability, then attach concrete validation/diff/test commands with evidence.

Quick Start

Ask your AI to design the public contract for a new API endpoint and include error, auth, idempotency, compatibility, examples, and exact verification commands.

Frequently Asked Questions about api-and-interface-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design an API contract before implementation to prevent breaking changes?

Design consumer-first API contracts by defining request/response shapes, errors, auth, and idempotency before code hardens them. This approach forces explicit specification of consumer-visible interfaces, reducing compatibility mistakes and unclear operational semantics across endpoints and SDKs.

What is the best way to handle backward compatibility and versioning for event schemas?

Handle backward compatibility by classifying additive, deprecating, and breaking changes up front. Require versioning, migration, rollback, and consumer impact evidence when modifying event schemas or webhook payloads to ensure external modules maintain stable behavior.

How do I specify idempotency and retry semantics for API endpoints?

Specify idempotency and retry semantics by documenting operational behaviors within the interface contract. Define exactly how endpoints handle duplicate requests, retry scenarios, and pagination or collection behavior to provide clear operational guarantees for consumers.

Can I use contract-first interface specification for CLI surfaces and plugin configurations?

Yes, contract-first interface specification applies to CLI surfaces, plugin configurations, SDK boundaries, and GraphQL operations. It defines required versus optional fields, nullability, defaults, and unknown-field behavior from the consumer's perspective before implementation.

How do I verify API contracts and operational semantics with concrete commands?

Verify API contracts by attaching concrete validation, diff, and test commands to the specification. Score and gate completion on confidence while ensuring evidence-backed decisions cover shape, errors, auth declarations, and operational semantics.

Why do my API implementations result in confusing consumer experiences and integration failures?

API implementations become confusing when consumer-visible interfaces are not specified as explicit contracts before code hardens them. Forcing contract-first design prevents breaking changes by requiring evidence-backed decisions for shape, errors, and compatibility.