API Design Review

To review an OpenAPI spec for consistency, submit the spec and team conventions to receive severity-ranked findings. This review checks naming, paths, HTTP methods, status codes, and error shapes, providing concrete rewrite recommendations to align with documentation expectations.

Evaluating API versioning strategies involves analyzing URL or header versioning approaches to assess how breaking changes are handled. This process produces severity-ranked findings and concrete recommendations aligned with team conventions during new API launches and standardization reviews.

Checking API designs for authentication and authorization flaws involves assessing security, auth, and scope design within the interface. Submitting the endpoint design yields severity-ranked findings and concrete rewrite recommendations to improve operational quality and security posture.

Yes, you can review in-progress interface designs and endpoint lists. Submitting in-progress designs during new API launches or standardization reviews produces severity-ranked findings and concrete rewrite recommendations for pagination, filtering, retry signals, and documentation completeness.

API pagination and filtering designs fail standardization reviews due to inconsistent operational quality and incomplete documentation. A review assesses these aspects alongside team conventions, returning severity-ranked findings and concrete rewrite recommendations to resolve the issues.