api-design-review

To review API design for logical gaps, you need a systematic review process that checks API contracts and design documents against multiple axes like client-server separation, access control, and forward compatibility. This prevents architectural flaws in early development stages.

An API design review checklist should cover client-server separation, ACL, forward-compatibility, edge cases, consistency with existing standards (SoT), and memory constraints. Analyzing these six axes ensures the system architecture has no logical gaps before implementation.

You need to review an ADR or design document before implementation begins, specifically when starting a new ADR, Design Doc, or API contract. Early stage review identifies potential access control, forward-compatibility, and edge case issues before the design is fully developed.

To ensure forward compatibility and handle edge cases in API contracts, conduct a detailed review using checklists that analyze these specific dimensions. Verifying consistency with existing standards also prevents future integration failures.

Yes, API design review works specifically without finalized implementation. It requires understanding of design documents, ADRs, and API contracts to identify potential gaps in the design phase, before the system architecture is fully developed.

A checklist-based approach for system architecture review is limited by the quality of the input design documents, ADRs, and API contracts provided. It identifies logical gaps across six specific axes but requires comprehensive initial documentation to be effective.