api-patterns

Choosing between REST, GraphQL, and tRPC depends on your project context, team structure, and deployment needs. A decision tree evaluates these factors to recommend the most suitable API style for your specific architecture.

Standardizing API versioning and pagination requires applying consistent design patterns across services. This framework provides guidance on response formats, error handling, and pagination to standardize integrations throughout your microservices architecture.

GraphQL is preferred over REST for complex data queries when your multi-team product needs lightweight versus robust data fetching capabilities. The decision checklist evaluates query complexity and team structure to recommend the appropriate style.

Yes, the API patterns framework includes anti-pattern guidance and a validator script to enforce cohesive design. It ensures consistent standards are applied when evaluating API styles for public APIs, microservices, and monorepos.

Enforcing consistent API design in a monorepo involves applying a decision checklist and validator script. This ensures cohesive API design across REST, GraphQL, and tRPC implementations by standardizing versioning and response formats.

tRPC can be evaluated for public APIs using the provided decision tree. The framework assesses project context and deployment needs to determine if tRPC is appropriate compared to REST or GraphQL for your public API requirements.