aps-legal-policy-content-rights

Identifies copyright, privacy, scraping, and integrity risks for algorithm-problem-solving products.

Updated Jul 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/100Thieves-team/plady-expert-skills --skill aps-legal-policy-content-rights-100thieves-team
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aps-legal-policy-content-rights
Source: https://github.com/100Thieves-team/plady-expert-skills/tree/main/algo-experts/skills/aps-legal-policy-content-rights
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/100Thieves-team/plady-expert-skills --skill aps-legal-policy-content-rights-100thieves-team

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Teams building Baekjoon/LeetCode-style judge or learning platforms face legal and policy uncertainty around storing problem statements, crawling platform data, reusing editorials, storing user submission code, and AI assistance in contests or assignments. This Skill surfaces those risks early and turns them into product requirements, scope boundaries, and verification questions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Risk Register Generation: Produces structured risk registers covering copyright, scraping/ToS, privacy (PIPA/GDPR/CCPA), minors' consent, AI training consent, and contest/assignment integrity. - Safer Content Strategy: Recommends product-safe content approaches such as link-out only, metadata-only storage, licensed content, and original problems, with trade-offs. - Policy Verification Checklist: Lists what to verify against official ToS, API limits, robots policies, contest rules, and AI provider retention settings. - Use Case: When a planner asks "can we crawl Baekjoon problems and summarize editorials for our MVP?", the Skill separates the CFAA/ToS/copyright questions, flags -NC/-ND license traps, and outputs an MVP recommendation with verification questions for counsel. ## Quick Start Ask the Skill to review whether your algorithm learning platform can store crawled problem statements and user submission code, and request a risk register with safer alternatives.

Frequently Asked Questions about aps-legal-policy-content-rights

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
Can I store Baekjoon or LeetCode problem statements in my own service?

Storing full problem statements carries copyright risk because the narrative text is protected expression, even though the underlying algorithm ideas are not. This Skill recommends safer alternatives like link-out only, metadata-only storage, or licensed and original content.

Is scraping public coding platform data legal?

Scraping involves three separate questions: computer crime statutes, Terms of Service breach, and copyright infringement. Public accessibility does not grant redistribution rights, and ToS violations remain an independent liability even when access itself is lawful.

What privacy laws apply to storing user submission code?

User code and submission history are personal data under PIPA in Korea, GDPR in the EU, and CCPA in California. The Skill maps requirements like consent, delete/export controls, and cross-border transfer rules when routing code to third-party AI providers.

Does this Skill provide legal advice for my product?

No, it explicitly does not provide legal advice and is not a lawyer. It surfaces issues, classifies risks, proposes product-safe alternatives, and identifies questions to verify with official sources, platform terms, or legal counsel.

How do I handle AI assistance during contests or assignments?

The Skill flags providing full AI solutions during live contests, interviews, or assignments as a red flag. It recommends mode-based AI restrictions and logging assistance levels where progress is compared to protect integrity.

Can I train AI models on user submission code?

Training on user submissions requires explicit, separate consent and cannot be buried in general terms of service. Under PIPA and GDPR it is a distinct processing purpose needing its own lawful basis and provider retention settings that exclude training.