What problem does it solve? Teams building algorithm-problem-solving products (Baekjoon/LeetCode-style judges and learning platforms) often measure only activity like solved counts and logins, missing whether users actually learn, whether recommendations fit, and whether judge sync is trustworthy. This Skill guides the team to define meaningful success metrics, analytics events, and operational health signals instead of vanity metrics. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Metrics Strategy Design: Produces North Star candidates, supporting metrics, guardrail metrics, and MVP validation plans grounded in frameworks like AARRR, HEART/GSM, and Goodhart's law. - Analytics Event Planning: Generates a tracking plan from a 21-event taxonomy (AttemptStarted, HintRevealed, VerdictReceived, ProblemRevisited, etc.) with naming conventions, idempotency, and identity-stitching rules. - Operational Health & Reliability: Defines SLI/SLO/error-budget targets for judge sync, AI services, and recommendation pipelines, plus data-quality and privacy rules. - Use Case: When the team asks "solved count 말고 뭘 봐야 해?" (what should we track besides solved count), the Skill outputs a metrics tree separating independent solving, learning retention, and recommendation fit, with guardrails against gaming. ## Quick Start Ask the Skill to define success metrics and an event tracking plan for your algorithm practice platform's MVP, including guardrail metrics and judge sync SLOs.