aps-product-metrics-operations

Defines product metrics, event taxonomies, and operational health signals for algorithm learning platforms.

Updated Jul 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/100Thieves-team/plady-expert-skills --skill aps-product-metrics-operations-100thieves-team
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aps-product-metrics-operations
Source: https://github.com/100Thieves-team/plady-expert-skills/tree/main/algo-experts/skills/aps-product-metrics-operations
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/100Thieves-team/plady-expert-skills --skill aps-product-metrics-operations-100thieves-team

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Teams building algorithm-problem-solving products (Baekjoon/LeetCode-style judges and learning platforms) often measure only activity like solved counts and logins, missing whether users actually learn, whether recommendations fit, and whether judge sync is trustworthy. This Skill guides the team to define meaningful success metrics, analytics events, and operational health signals instead of vanity metrics. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Metrics Strategy Design: Produces North Star candidates, supporting metrics, guardrail metrics, and MVP validation plans grounded in frameworks like AARRR, HEART/GSM, and Goodhart's law. - Analytics Event Planning: Generates a tracking plan from a 21-event taxonomy (AttemptStarted, HintRevealed, VerdictReceived, ProblemRevisited, etc.) with naming conventions, idempotency, and identity-stitching rules. - Operational Health & Reliability: Defines SLI/SLO/error-budget targets for judge sync, AI services, and recommendation pipelines, plus data-quality and privacy rules. - Use Case: When the team asks "solved count 말고 뭘 봐야 해?" (what should we track besides solved count), the Skill outputs a metrics tree separating independent solving, learning retention, and recommendation fit, with guardrails against gaming. ## Quick Start Ask the Skill to define success metrics and an event tracking plan for your algorithm practice platform's MVP, including guardrail metrics and judge sync SLOs.

Frequently Asked Questions about aps-product-metrics-operations

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I define success metrics for an algorithm practice platform?

Start from the product promise and apply Goals-Signals-Metrics: state the goal, identify observable user signals, then pick metrics. Favor outcome metrics like independent solves and delayed re-solves over raw AC counts, and pair every optimization target with a guardrail metric.

What metrics should I track besides solved count?

Track attempts started, review completion, re-solve after delay, variation solves for transfer, recommendation start and completion rates, and hint dependency over time. These distinguish actual learning and independent solving from mere activity or assistance-inflated results.

How do I design an analytics event taxonomy for a learning product?

Use a consistent Object-Action naming convention, prefer few events with rich properties over many near-duplicate events, and separate exposure, start, completion, and outcome. Maintain a tracking plan documenting triggers, required properties, and owners as the contract between product and engineering.

How do I set SLOs for external judge submission sync?

Define an SLI such as sync success rate or p95 latency, then set an SLO like 99.5% of accounts synced within 5 minutes over 28 days. Treat the error budget as a signal to pause feature work, and surface data freshness to users since stale sync corrupts downstream metrics.

What are the limitations of A/B testing on small learning platforms?

Small user bases produce underpowered tests that miss real effects, so compute required sample size before running. Watch for novelty effects, sample ratio mismatch, and network interference in social features like study groups, which may require cluster-level randomization.

Why is raw AC count a bad learning metric?

Total AC mixes assisted and independent solving and says nothing about retention or transfer. Goodhart's law applies: once targeted, users game it with easy problems, so pair volume metrics with independence and delayed re-solve counter-metrics.