ara-rigor-reviewer

Semantic epistemic review objectively assesses Agent-Native Research Artifacts by scoring evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, and methodological rigor. It generates severity-ranked reports with actionable suggestions and Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendations.

To perform a peer review, provide the path to your ARA artifact. The review assesses six rigor dimensions, generates severity scores, and saves a constructive improvement report as 'level2_report.json' in the artifact root directory.

Yes, the review requires specifically structured and annotated ARA files. It is designed for ARA authors who have already passed Level 1 structural validation and need an objective critique before publication.

An epistemic review report includes calibrated severity scores across six dimensions, a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation, and actionable suggestions for improving the research artifact's methodological rigor and argument coherence.

No, you should not use this review for unvalidated ARA files. The semantic epistemic review is explicitly designed as a second step for artifacts that have already passed Level 1 structural validation.

Scope calibration is assessed as one of six core dimensions during the semantic epistemic review. The process objectively evaluates the artifact's claims and methods, assigning a calibrated severity score to ensure research scope aligns with presented evidence.