aras-peer-reviewer

Automate structured peer review of LaTeX manuscripts into JSON critiques.

Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Bhavya-Dhoot/Autonomous-Research-Agent-System-ARAS- --skill aras-peer-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aras-peer-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Bhavya-Dhoot/Autonomous-Research-Agent-System-ARAS-/tree/main/aras/skills/reviewing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Bhavya-Dhoot/Autonomous-Research-Agent-System-ARAS- --skill aras-peer-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Peer review of research manuscripts is time-consuming and error-prone; this Skill automates a structured evaluation and scoring.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated JSON-based peer review scoring with major/minor issues
  • LaTeX paper.tex input handling and cycle-based revision gating
  • Actionable revision directives for authors and editors

Quick Start

Feed paper.tex to the Skill to generate a structured JSON peer-review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about aras-peer-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate peer review for a LaTeX research manuscript?

Automated peer review for a LaTeX manuscript requires feeding paper.tex into the Skill, which then applies a defined JSON schema to output rigorously formatted scores and actionable revision directives.

What is structured JSON peer review scoring and how does it work?

Structured JSON peer review scoring is an automated process that evaluates a research manuscript and outputs a rigorously formatted JSON file containing specific scores, identified issues, and revision directives for authors and editors.

Can I use this automated paper review tool during manuscript revision cycles?

Yes, the automated paper review tool is designed specifically for manuscript revision cycles, applying cycle-based scoring and revision gating to ensure authors address major and minor issues before proceeding.

What JSON schema format is required for generating an automated paper critique?

Generating an automated paper critique requires a defined JSON schema to enforce a rigorously formatted output, ensuring the resulting report consistently contains scores, issues, and actionable revision directives.

Does automated peer review distinguish between major and minor revision issues?

Yes, the automated peer review process distinguishes between major and minor issues, enforcing actionable revision directives in the JSON output to guide authors and editors through manuscript improvements.