ARC-7

Convene seven AI personas to review system designs and generate architectural reports.

3|Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ksmeltzer/ARC-7 --skill arc-7
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ARC-7
Source: https://github.com/ksmeltzer/ARC-7/tree/main/skills/ARC-7
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ksmeltzer/ARC-7 --skill arc-7

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Convene an elite architectural decision panel using 7 specialized AI personas — each running on an optimal GitHub Copilot model. It supports three modes: reviewing the current conversation context, reviewing a specific document/proposal, or reviewing a full codebase from a GitHub URL. The panel applies multi-model cognitive diversity, structured debate with governance, blind voting for critical decisions, and formal conflict resolution — grounded in ensemble learning principles and adversarial review dynamics.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 7 specialized AI personas orchestrated as a panel to critique architecture, security, API design, and product value
  • Three review modes: current conversation context, a specific document, or a full codebase from a GitHub URL
  • Structured debate, governance, blind voting, and synthesized architectural reports for enterprise-grade validation

Quick Start

Invoke ARC-7 to review the current conversation, a document, or a GitHub codebase.

Frequently Asked Questions about ARC-7

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get an AI architectural review for a full GitHub codebase?

To get an AI architectural review for a full GitHub codebase, you can use a multi-model panel to assess the repository directly from its GitHub URL. This convenes specialized AI personas to evaluate system design, security, and API structure.

How do I run a structured design review on a specific architectural document?

You can run a structured design review on a specific document by passing it to an AI review panel. The panel uses governance, formal conflict resolution, and synthesized reporting to validate the proposal's architecture and product value.

Can I use multi-model AI debate to evaluate my current system design context?

Yes, you can use multi-model AI debate to evaluate your current system design context. The review panel supports analyzing the active conversation context directly, applying adversarial review dynamics and ensemble learning principles to validate architecture.

What is the best way to resolve architectural conflicts during a codebase review?

The best way to resolve architectural conflicts during a codebase review is through a panel using formal conflict resolution and blind voting. This approach forces specialized AI personas to debate governance and synthesis rules until a consensus is reached.

Does multi-model cognitive diversity improve security and API design assessments?

Multi-model cognitive diversity improves security and API design assessments by leveraging ensemble learning principles. Running specialized AI personas on optimal models ensures adversarial review dynamics catch flaws that a single model might miss.

When should I use a seven-person AI panel instead of a single model for system design validation?

You should use a seven-person AI panel instead of a single model for system design validation when you need enterprise-grade governance, blind voting, and structured debate. It provides synthesized architectural reports grounded in adversarial review dynamics.