arch-options-compare

Compare architecture options by scoring against SOLID principles, cost, complexity, and team skills.

5|1|Updated Jan 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tikazyq/agentic-spec-forge --skill arch-options-compare
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: arch-options-compare
Source: https://github.com/tikazyq/agentic-spec-forge/tree/main/AGENTIC_SPEC_FORGE/spec_stage_skill/design/arch-options-compare
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tikazyq/agentic-spec-forge --skill arch-options-compare

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps in making informed architectural decisions by systematically comparing different design patterns and providing a clear, data-driven recommendation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comparative Analysis: Evaluates multiple architectural solutions (e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Serverless) against key criteria.
  • Scoring: Assigns scores based on SOLID principles, cost, complexity, and team skill alignment.
  • Recommendation: Generates a comparison table and provides a justified recommendation for the most suitable architecture.
  • Use Case: When deciding on the core architecture for a new project, use this Skill to compare a microservices approach against a modular monolith, presenting the trade-offs to stakeholders.

Quick Start

Compare the 'monolith' and 'microservices' architecture options for our project, considering cost and complexity.

Frequently Asked Questions about arch-options-compare

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compare microservices and monolith architectures for a new project?

To compare microservices and monolith architectures, you can evaluate them against criteria like SOLID principles, cost, complexity, and team skill alignment. This generates a comparative scoring table and a recommended solution with justifications for client presentations.

What is the best way to decide between serverless and microservices architecture?

Deciding between serverless and microservices architecture involves scoring each option against cost, complexity, and team skill alignment. A systematic comparison generates a clear table of trade-offs and a justified recommendation suitable for architectural decision records.

How does architecture comparison scoring based on SOLID principles work?

Architecture comparison scoring evaluates multiple design patterns by assigning scores against SOLID principles, cost, complexity, and team skill alignment. This data-driven mechanism produces a comparative table highlighting trade-offs and a final recommended solution.

Can I use this architecture comparison for generating Architectural Decision Records?

Yes, you can use this architecture comparison for generating Architectural Decision Records (ADRs). The Skill outputs a comparative table and a justified recommendation, providing the clear, data-driven documentation needed for ADRs and stakeholder presentations.

When should I not use a microservices architecture over a modular monolith?

You should reconsider a microservices architecture over a modular monolith when the scoring criteria for cost, complexity, and team skill alignment favor a monolithic approach. The comparison highlights specific trade-offs and limitations to justify the most suitable architecture.