arch-review

You can identify architectural boundaries in a codebase by running an interactive noun-analysis workflow. This process examines the codebase to extract domain models, which are then used to map out module ownership and define a target architecture blueprint for refactoring.

Noun analysis is a domain modeling technique used during an architecture review to identify key entities within a codebase. It helps uncover natural module ownership and architectural boundaries, which are then used to produce a coherent target architecture blueprint.

You can plan a codebase refactor safely by using an interactive workflow that proposes a target blueprint for collaborative review. Once refined, changes are committed atomically through Subject Matter Experts and QA verification to ensure safe implementation.

Yes, you can remove dead code during an architectural improvement workflow. The interactive process guides scoping, planning, and dead-code removal alongside iterative blueprint execution, ensuring that structural cleanup is safely integrated into the refactor.

Yes, blueprint-driven refactoring requires QA verification before committing changes. The workflow coordinates atomic changes through Subject Matter Experts and QA to ensure that the architectural improvements are safe and meet quality standards before implementation.

The best way to document architectural changes after a refactor is to use a workflow that automatically updates documentation upon completion. This ensures that stakeholders remain aligned with the new target architecture blueprint and implemented modifications.